![]() ![]() One other drawback of VisualHub is the deinterlace algorithm: if you deinterlace the source video it will throw away half the lines, lowering the vertical resolution, which is unacceptable for me. ![]() The size of the movies produced with those settings were almost the same, and the differences in quality between them negligible. I asked the developer and he confirmed it.Īltough I have to admit that the settings that were most pleasing for me (noisy videos included) are: Problem with VisualHub is that I can’t do any filtering in order to remove noise. Noise doesn’t compress well and produces ugly artifacts. Quality great if source is clean (see below)Ĭons: well, many of my clips are low light and the camera produced quite some noisy videos. Pros: great user interface, very simple to use (if you read the manual), very fast. ![]() Pros: already on the system, nothing to download, build, compileĬons: SLOOOOOW especially H264! An I could not figure out a good set of settings to provide good image quality. ![]() Here is what I’ve tried so far: QuicktimePro (don’t ask me) Compressing them in divx or something like that would save a lot of space. Since my new Macbook Pro has enough power to compress videos, I thought I would try to compress all my movies made with my digital camera. This was tested on Macbook Pro, Mac OS X 10.4.9 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |